|
What follows may sound like a
criticism of Barak Obama, but it
fact it has a much wider
application. In the opinion of this
writer, I have seldom seen deeper
and more profound divisions of
opinion across the public and
financial spectrums. The only
reason I mention the President is
his famous promise to bring various
antagonistic sectors together, a
pledge which has been a dismal
failure as we believe those
divisions are wider now than ever.
The reason these divisions appear
important in our work regarding the
worlds of precious and base metal
mining is that divisions heighten
controversy, controversies heighten
a sense of uncertainty and
uncertainty has been a vital
component of historic precious
metals bull markets.
It is our belief that not only are
those divisions deep and appear to
be irresolvable but also they bring
into question some of the most
deeply-held convictions possessed by
political, economic and social
leaders. Among those contrasting
convictions are the questions of
individual liberty versus collective
responsibility; free markets versus
government dominated and regulated
markets and, at its most basic,
currencies of value backed by
materials of substance versus
currencies created at will and
backed only by the ‘full faith and
credit’ of their issuing
governments.
Strangely enough, although they
appears to be separate questions,
there is consistency of opinion in
the fact that those on the political
Left normally advocate collective
social responsibility, government
dominated markets and fiat
currencies while those on the Right
generally favor individual liberty,
free markets and currencies backed
by genuine value.
What brought this entire series of
thoughts to mind was the reality of
what is happening to the
Eurocurrency during the present time
frame. Even the most ardent
advocate of the Eurocurrency cannot
help but admit that it is failing;
that it is not providing the main
function of money which is to serve
as a storehouse of value; and that
even its role as a medium of
exchange is now in jeopardy.
Several nations – particularly
Greece – appear destined to return
to their original currencies and no
one can predict what will happen to
the remaining Eurocurrency nations
if first one then other began to
abandon the Euro.
If the Euro fails and countries
return to their ‘home’ currencies,
then an entire new procedure must be
worked out among already-stressed
banks and that is coming to be known
by the term “redenomination of
risk.” No one can be certain
exactly how this is to be
accomplished, if necessary.
The great question I would pose
relates to the fact that no new fist
currency was ever planned on what
appeared to be a more solid basis.
All countries agreed to abide by
stern agreements limiting the size
of their deficits in relation to
their Gross Domestic Product. Gold
was taken into the European Central
Bank – but not in sufficient amounts
to make the currency truly
convertible. Plans were put into
effect to help poorer nations to
attain greater levels of prosperity.
However, despite precautions such as
these, here we are just a dozen
years after the Euro’s creation and
the currency appears to be falling
apart at the seams, and there is a
concomitant fear that if Europe
returns to the chaotic world of
numerous currencies of continually
changing value, then the resultant
situation could deteriorate even
further.
And so we return to the question of
what constitutes real monetary
value. Is it money that is
created at will by mankind’s
financial and political leaders or
is it a naturally-evolved currency
built around the concept of
exchanging value – gold and/or
silver – for the values represented
by the goods and services purchased
through the use of currency based on
such values..
Our guiding policy relating to the
precious metals remains this: as
long as the world persists in
attempting to transact commerce via
fiat currencies, the danger of
ultimate default will rise and, as
such risk appears to be increasing,
increments of additional capital
will find their way into the
presumed safety of precious metals
investments.
As we approach the publication of
our annual forecast for 212, that
guiding principle appears valid.
Several weeks ago, we mentioned the
growth of another threat to American
economic stability, namely the
potential failure of what is loosely
referred to as the “Muni” market,
namely those bonds on which all
interest is fully deductible for
taxation purposes and which,
therefore, are highly attractive to
high-income investors. Municipal
bonds are issued by both states and
municipalities and are a favoured
means of raising capital for
projects deemed to be necessary for
the public well-being.
One of those projects was a new
sewer system for the city of
Birmingham, Alabama and more than $3
billion in municipal general
revenue bonds were issued to
finance the project. We emphasize
the ‘general revenue’ portion
because many investors favour
general revenue bonds because
general tax revenues can be applied
to both principal and interest
payments.
Many people also assumed that those
payments would continue even in the
rare events of a municipal
bankruptcy because taxation revenues
would continue to flow while the
bankruptcy was being adjudicated,
but that may not be the case at
all. As we reported recently,
Jefferson County, Alabama did file
bankruptcy. However, to the
consternation of ‘Muni’ markets,
lawyers for the County are now
arguing that holders of those bonds
should have to wait in line with all
other creditors before they can
receive further funds.
The threat to the future viability
of municipal bonds in general is
real and, in or opinion, is growing
as many more communities and states
are encountering difficulties
relating to payments of their
expenses and future bankruptcies are
not out of the question. Now that
refusal to pay principal and
interest until a municipality
emerges from bankruptcy procedures
could put a damper on all future
municipal bonds sales, and that is a
real concern.
This is just another serious problem
that the financial world must
resolve.
All quotes US Dollars unless
otherwise indicated.
Next Melman Minute scheduled for
Friday, December 2, 2011
|