|
NOTE: Mr. Melman will be
speaking at the Cambridge
House "Calgary Resource &
Investment Conference"
scheduled for March 30 &
31. His workshop topic will
be "An Economic Perfect
Storm - updated March 2012."
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER > |
 |
Talk about a double-bind with which
Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke must
contend. On the one hand, he must
convince the public that the Fed's
policies are working and, in order
to satisfy political pressure, that
the economy is becoming more
robust. On the other hand, he must
convince the banking establishment
and the government that the economy
is NOT performing in a robust manner
and therefore interest rates must be
kept at rock-bottom.
He must also convince those same
groups that, on the one hand, he
will not fuel the fires of inflation
by keeping interest rates at
historic low levels but also
convince those same listeners that
rock-bottom low interest rates are
presently essential for the future
of the economy. If that sounds
confusing, just consider his recent
pronouncements.
Just two weeks ago, as readers may
recall, Bernanke stated that since
the economy appeared to be improving
- particularly in view of February's
Department of Labor jobs report - no
further Quantitative Easing (QE)
programs were being contemplated.
Upon hearing that news, the gold and
silver markets plunged with the
yellow metal ending that session
down by $92.
Now, please fast-forward to this
morning. At a speech to the
National association for Business
Economics, Bernanke reversed course
and now, as reported by Reuters,
declared that despite the strong
jobs report "...the U.S. job market
remains weak and that the Federal
Reserve's existing policies will
boost growth." The Reuters article
concluded that, "...the central bank
is prepared to keep interest rates
near zero unless the economy
improves substantially." He also
stated that he did not expect the
Unemployment Rate to continue
declining as rapidly as it has
during the past several months.
That sounds to us that he may be
preparing the groundwork for future
announcements that stimulation in
the form of additional QE may indeed
be in the works.
Since gold fell sharply on the
earlier statement suggesting there
would be no further QE programs, it
is not surprising that it has
rallied somewhat when the opposite
suggestion was raised and, as can be
seen on gold's chart, the yellow
metal has indeed gained over $40
since its very recent trading lows.
Although gold remains far below its
highs of last month, it has, for the
moment anyway, been able to reverse
the recent downtrend.
In our opinion, the one most
important statistic to watch in
order to determine future Fed policy
is the reported rate of what we
refer to as 'visible inflation',
specifically the type of inflation
the public will not ignore such as
rising gas prices, rising food
prices, rising out-of-pocket medical
prices and restaurant prices. As
long as the public perception
remains that these are under
control, the Fed may very well
succeed with its double-barrelled
strategies, but if visible inflation
raises its ugly head, they will be
forced to modify their stance and
that could lead to rapid rises in
interest rates to rein in such
inflationary pressures - and THAT
could open the door to a host of new
problems which we have discussed in
previous entries in this space.
One thing is becoming apparent in
all this: the gold and silver
markets will be paying attention to
such developments.
Please allow me to return to a
favourite subject.
I have written several times about a
peculiar change in investment
information which has occurred
during the past several decades.
For the greater part of investment
history, it was news of individual
company results that drove markets
and, as these individual results
were viewed on a collective basis,
market averages made their up and
down moves.
However, during recent years,
individual news seems to now play a
back-seat role to pronouncements by
government leaders and we have an
excellent example this morning.
Following Bernanke's comments noted
above, the New York Stock Exchange
reported that at the opening, all
thirty stocks making up the Dow
Jones Industrial Average were on the
plus side! Are we really
supposed to believe that each of the
thirty companies reported positive
news about their operations?
Our point is simply that in order to
evaluate trends in the financial
markets, it is now an essential
ingredient to follow - and
anticipate where possible - the
statements of political and
financial leaders as much or more
than individual company news items.
In last Friday's Melman Minute, I
wrote a piece about how differences
in political philosophy and policy
truly mattered in terms of economic
outcomes. By one of those pleasant
coincidences, I just noticed an item
in the press which demonstrates
clearly that there are vast
differences between governmental
policies toward mining - and those
differences do indeed matter.
Let's take two jurisdictions as our
examples, namely California and
Quebec. I had the pleasure of
living in California not too many
years ago and also, through my
association with "ICMJ's
Prospecting and MINING Journal"
(published out of Aptos,
California), I have been able to
keep an active eye on mining
policies in that state. Simply put,
I hold to the opinion that the
regulatory climate relating to
mining in California is difficult
for individual prospectors and
presents almost insuperable
obstacles to the licensing of new
commercial mining ventures.
In other words, in a similar vein to
the Province of British Columbia
under the previous New Democratic
Party regime where the Ministry of
Mines could have easily been
re-named to the "Ministry of No
Mines", it is exceedingly difficult
to obtain regulatory and permitting
approval for new commercial mining
ventures in that state.
Contrast that situation to the
Canadian Province of Quebec,
consistently ranked as one of the
most favored of all worldwide mining
jurisdictions. That province
rewards expenditures for mining
exploration and development,
provides a substantial body of
geological data and has worked hard
to foster a pro-mining image by
regarding mining not as some 'dirty'
industry to be discouraged but
rather as a vital contributor to the
economic and social well-being of
the province.
As a result, investment in Quebec's
mining industry has soared from
C$700,000,000 in 2006 to well over
C$4,000,000,000 in 2012 and the
province now expects such
expenditures to approach or even
exceed five billion C$ in 2013.
One of the province's major banks,
National Bank Financial, Inc. just
issued a report which included the
information that, "...Quebec's
mining sector is becoming an
important growth driver for the
province."
It is all a question of attitude.
As of 9:30 AM PDT, financial markets
in Canada and the USA are headed
higher with the TSX Index up by
about 80 points while the Dow
Industrials are ahead by more than
100. Precious metals continue to
show gains with gold ahead by almost
$25 per ounce to near $1,687 while
silver has gained about 60 cents to
near $32.55. Base metals are
moderately higher on balance while
mining shares are about one percent
to the plus side.
In other markets the US$ Index is
off by about 35 basis points, Crude
Oil is close to unchanged and long
term interest rates are very
slightly higher.
All quotes US$ unless otherwise
noted.
Next Melman Minute is scheduled
for Thursday, March 29 due to travel
related to my speaking schedule at
the Cambridge House Conference in
Calgary March 30-31
|